Electronic Cigarettes
Electronic Cigarettes New Study Reveals Quitting Smoking is Excellent but Switching to Low-risk Nicotine Goods is Typically Far better
Electronic Cigarettes
Prof. Carl V. Phillips, just published in Harm Reduction Journal, shows that for most smokers, instantly switching to a low-risk option will lower their risk of dying from their habit far more than quitting ultimately, even if they use the smoke-no cost product for the rest of their lives.

New Study Reveals Quitting Smoking is Good but Switching to Low-risk Nicotine Merchandise is Typically Better

Ferndale, WA (PRWEB) November 2, 2009

Switching to low-risk nicotine products, like smokeless tobacco, electronic cigarettes, and pharmaceutical nicotine, delivers smokers a chance to virtually entirely eliminate their wellness risks. While these option products still pose some extremely modest well being risk, a new study at the University of Alberta School of Public Well being in Canada shows that in most circumstances switching is greater for decreasing lifetime risk than attempting to quit. The study by Prof. Carl V. Phillips, just published in Harm Reduction Journal, shows that for most smokers, instantly switching to a low-risk option will lower their risk of dying from their habit more than quitting ultimately, even if they use the smoke-no cost product for the rest of their lives.

For the average smoker, the study finds, smoking for just 1 much more month poses a greater wellness risk than a lifetime of utilizing one of the increasingly well-liked low risk merchandise like snuff, snus, the new electronic imitation cigarettes, nicotine lozenges, or some other non-combustion alternative. Switching items is a strategy known as “tobacco harm reduction.” “It has long been identified that although no nicotine product is entirely harmless, harm reduction merchandise pose only about 1% the risk from smoking,” says Dr. Phillips, “and this difference is so great that for the average smoker, utilizing a smokeless item for the rest of his life poses about the exact same risk as 30 days of continuing to smoke.” What this means is that most smokers, even those who strategy to quit soon, will not quit prior to damaging their wellness far far more than using low-risk products for a lifetime. Moreover, for some older smokers, smoking for a day or two a lot more poses a higher risk than using a low-risk item for the rest of their life. Because switching items is typically much far more appealing to smokers than quitting nicotine entirely, this choice is a lot more practical than quitting and leaves the former smoker happier and less likely to relapse. Those who switch can still decide on to quit entirely later, lowering their risk further still.

Dr. Phillips and his public health analysis group publish the web site http://www.TobaccoHarmReduction.org, and have worked for years to educate smokers about the advantages of low-risk alternatives. The new study, which also looks at some of the history and politics of tobacco harm reduction, suggests that efforts to promote abstinence as the only healthy option may possibly be killing thousands of smokers per month. Discouraging switching causes the deaths of far a lot more smokers than could ever die from using low-risk nicotine merchandise for their entire lives.

This study comes on the heels of a major study by Peter Lee, published in an additional BioMed Central journal, BMC Medicine, that showed that the Cancer risk from smokeless tobacco is so tiny it cannot even be reliably measured. Given the ample evidence about the risks of different items, “there is no scientific basis for denying the positive aspects of tobacco harm reduction” says Phillips, “and it is time that we give smokers honest public wellness interventions rather than the moralizing and deadly ‘abstinence-only’ approach.” The abstinence-only approach leaves several ex-smokers miserable and leaves millions of other people no choice but to keep smoking. Some activists object to option products due to the fact they let smokers remain addicted to nicotine or permit organizations to profit from selling the products. But, asks Phillips, “is addiction to a low-risk habit — not much different from drinking coffee — actually such a dilemma, or is the profitability of some firms so terrible that it outweighs the millions of lives that could be saved by harm reduction?”

Contact: Dr. Carl V. Phillips, Associate Professor, University of Alberta School of Public Health: cvphilo(at)gmail(dot)com +1 651-503-6746

Professor Phillips is an epidemiologist and wellness policy researcher, journal editor, common educator, and consultant. He and his work group are leading advocates of tobacco harm reduction, and he advises and works with numerous other organizations who are attempting to promote it, some of which are firms that hope to profit from selling low-risk nicotine items. The http://www.TobaccoHarmReduction.org investigation group at the University of Alberta School of Public Well being is partially supported by an unrestricted (totally hands-off) grant from U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Firm. No funder, organization, or other organization played any role in initiating, designing, or conducting this research.

# # #

©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.

Electronic Cigarettes

The anti-smoking lobby has become so radical and nutty that their perverse logic would seem to dictate a preference for smokers to keep on using real cigarettes. Currently, they so badly hate the e-cigarette that they are actively trying to ban its use or sale. However, such a ban on the e-cigarette will only have the unintended effect of keeping many smokers using real cigarettes.

Of course, their cautious attitude towards the e-cigarette is understandable. What is not understandable is their radical crusade against the e-cigarette.

They point out that not enough research has been done the e-cigarette. Hey, fair enough. More research on the e-cigarette certainly needs to be done. But, really is there anybody that really thinks that the E-Cigarettes is more dangerous than the real cigarettes? Real cigarettes contain more than 4,000 known chemicals that are bad for people’s health. The e-cigarette does not contain anywhere near that many harmful chemicals. Furthermore, the primary ingredient in the e-cigarette is nicotine. While nicotine is not a completely Safe drug, most medical professionals do not think that nicotine is the primary culprit behind the many health problems that cigarette smoking causes.

Next, the zealots try to say, “well recent FDA testing showed that E-Cigarettes contain nitrosamines and diethylene glycol, which is found in anti-freeze.” Of course, they don’t bother tell you that nitrosamines are found in many products that are approved by the FDA as smoking cessation aids. Nor do they bother to tell you that only two brands of E-Cigarettes were actually tested by the FDA. Or that the diethylene glycol was found in only one of the E-Cigarettes at very low levels.

The upshot of the anti-smoking zealot’s crusade against the e-cigarette is that it will likely keep many smokers on real cigarettes. The success rates of current smoking cessation products is rather dismal. The e-cigarette, while not perfect, presents at least a better alternative to smoking than real cigarettes. But, the zealots say, “nope don’t use the e-cigarette”. For smokers who can’t quit smoking, that is tantamount to saying, ” just keep smoking real cigarettes.” Good job anti-smoking zealots. Really, that is just awesome.

One of the hardest habits to quit is smoking. Any former or current smoker will verify that. Most smokers have tried to quit smoking at one time or another. Many of them fail because nicotine is so very addicting. Recently, however, there has been a technological breakthrough that may give some smokers hope to quit cigarettes or at least to cut down on the number of cigarettes they smoke. That breakthrough is the electronic cigarette.

Only invented a couple of years ago, the electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, has been a popular hit with smokers. Many of those smokers feel that “electronic smoking” is much better than real smoking. Technically, the electronic cigarette is not smoked at all. Instead, it is “vaped”. That is because electronic cigarettes do not produce any smoke at all. They only produce a vapor that is inhaled. The fact that electronic cigarettes don’t produce smoke is what most likely makes them safer than real cigarettes.

Although there are many brands of E-Cigarettes on the market, they are all designed pretty much the same. The main components of the electronic cigarette are a vaporizer, a liquid nicotine Cartridge, a battery, and a Light Emitting Diode (LED). When a e-cigarette is inhaled, nicotine from the liquid Cartridge is turned into a fine mist by the vaporizer, which is powered by a small battery. As the e-cigarette is being inhaled, the LED glows, mimicking the effect of a real cigarette.

The Electronic Cigarette has been somewhat controversial. Some anti-smoking advocates object to the Electronic Cigarette on the basis that they have not been sufficiently tested. But, not every expert agrees with those anti-smoking advocates. Many health experts have stated that, as a real cigarette usually contains over 4,000 harmful chemicals, the Electronic Cigarette is almost certainly safer, as the vapor produced by it is almost all nicotine. Although nicotine is not completely Safe, most experts think that it is the other chemicals in cigarettes that cause most of the harm to health. Furthermore, the smoke itself is harmful. As mentioned, the Electronic Cigarette does not produce smoke. Instead it produces vapor.

Despite the controversy, many cigarette smokers are still choosing “electronic smoking” over real smoking. Many of those smokers have reported improvements in their health. And others have reported quitting smoking altogether. In short, while their is no solid statistical proof on the effectiveness of the Electronic Cigarette as smoking cessation aid, there is pretty strong anecdotal evidence concerning the electronic cigarette’s effectiveness in helping smokers to avoid real cigarettes.

Here is more information about electronic cigarettes

Have you ever heard of Electronic Cigarettes?I my opinion, electronic cigarettes are the biggest invention in the history of smoking tobacco – while not consuming nicotine is alway´s better than doing it, electronic cigarettes are offering a much healthier alternative to traditional cigarettes for all not able to quit smoking.

I know how hard it is to quit smoking cigarettes – I tried it several times without any success until I utilized electronic cigarettes!

Why are they better than traditional cigarettes?Now, there are a couple of Reasons making electronic cigarettes to a healthier method to inhale nicotine. Electronic Cigarettes do not burn any tobacco, instead they vaporize a water, Propylene Glycol, nicotine and flavor mixture.In this vaporized mixture are none of the Cancer causing agents you find in the smoke of traditional cigarettes. There are no tar or Carbon mono oxide.There is still nicotine, so there is still the danger of addiction and all the bad sideeffects of nicotine.Many electronic cigarette Companies offer a lot of different nicotine levels, reaching from 18 mg (real strong cigarettes without filter) down to 0 mg nicotine (No nicotine, only flavor).

Other benefits of smoking electronic cigarettes?

1. In most cases you will save a serious amount of money, depending on the price of the traditional cigarettes in your country!

2. All the anti smoking laws and restrictions are not valid for electronic cigarettes – You Don´t Smoke – You Vaporize!This opens the possibility to slowly cure your Nicotine Addiction by decreasing your choosen nicotine level until you only inhale flavor without any nicotine!

Incoming search terms:

• can i use smokeless cigarettes while on paxil
• are electronic cigarettes better than tobacco cigarettes while pregnant